Which question addresses whether you can be trusted with responsibilities?

• A. Can I be trusted with responsibilities?
• B. Do I seek promotions unfairly?
• C. Do I handle equipment safely?
• D. Do I avoid accountability?

Answer: (A)

The main idea here is whether a person is trustworthy enough to be given responsibilities. In ministry and Christian living, being trustworthy is essential for stewardship—letters of responsibility require integrity, reliability, and faithfulness. The question itself directly asks about that trust: “Can I be trusted with responsibilities?” and it names the exact quality that must be demonstrated.

Why this one is the best fit: it targets the core requirement for any entrusted task—the ability to be trusted. If someone is considered for responsibilities, trustworthiness is the foundational criterion; without it, other qualifications won’t matter as much.

The other options touch related issues but don’t address trust with responsibilities as clearly. “Do I seek promotions unfairly?” concerns integrity in advancement, which is related but not the direct question of whether you can be trusted to handle duties. “Do I handle equipment safely?” speaks to competence and safety, important but not the same thing as trustworthiness. “Do I avoid accountability?” points to a problematic posture toward responsibility, which is precisely what you want to avoid when being entrusted with duties.

In short, the direct question about being trusted with responsibilities best captures the quality of character and reliability needed for entrusted tasks, aligning with the biblical emphasis on faithful stewardship.